OP-Ed
on Gun Control
Patrice has
been on a tear of late regarding gun control and background checks, and while I
have been sitting on the sidelines since many of my thoughts regarding gun
limitation are far more restrictive than anything our legislators have passed.
What changed my mind to action and speak out? The recent photo in the Wall Street Journal
depicted here. I have to ask: “Is this
the America we want as a nation?” When I
saw this picture I thought it might have been a photo from Eastern Ukraine,
Syria, the Gaza Strip or a host of other Third World countries who are engaged
in running conflicts – CBS Evening News reported that there are 41 shooting
wars around the globe today, but no it was taken in Midland, Texas. We have traveled to Third World countries
where this would not be a strange sight, the Yucatan Peninsula comes quickly to
mind where local “authorities” in civilian clothes walked the street with sawed
off shotguns slung over their shoulders.
It is time
to stop this nonsense; we need to push our Constitution back to the intent of
our Founding Fathers, before we become a lawless state where we will find the
Old West – two guys in the street drunk and shooting at each other, in a street
near your home. Despite what the
“Supremes” have ruled, if you go back and review the six Second Amendment
drafts that were rejected in favor of the current one, I think anyone
untarnished by the tripe of the NRA will readily conclude that it was the
intent of our First Congress to provide for a well-organized Militia (what we
now refer to as our State National Guard units) that would be organized, armed
and disciplined to “suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.” From my reading of Section 8 of the
Constitution, Congress has the authority
to “provide for the common Defence” with the Militia being the vehicle for such
defense. To carry this thought a step
further, Founding Father Thomas Jefferson, as President Thomas Jefferson,
proposed that the federal army be disbanded with all defense being delegated to
the State Militias. Congress didn’t
agree, but certainly it is hard to question that Jefferson was a knowledgeable
participant in the inception of our Nation and a voice in the constitutional
process.
I see little
comparison between the Founding Fathers view of citizen soldiers armed with
single shot muskets who would respond to an impending threat by the clang of
the town’s church bells and today’s xenophobic, undisciplined, and often
untrained rabble that call themselves the NRA.
To make my point, I hiked into the national forest yesterday – signs
along the road said “no target shooting next 12 miles,” “no target shooting
next 11 miles” – I assume these admonitions continued until you left the
national forest: Could anything be more clear?
When I reached the top of Mount Herman, I could hear random shooting
from the west where there once WAS a shooting range. Occasionally the shooting broke into bursts
of 5 to 15 shots, where I suppose these would-be Rambo’s enacted some fantasy
of glorify, death and mayhem. Is this
the NRA’s view of trained, responsible and sensible gun use? And to add to this unauthorized,
irresponsible target shooting, there is a trail loop just behind their “killing
zone” – one of the reasons the shooting range was closed.
Our country
saw the threat in driving cars without proper training on the laws of the road,
the practical training of the novice in safe driving habits and a testing and
licensing procedure that would demonstrate your knowledge of the laws, mental
stability behind the wheel and competence to meeting reasonable standards of
performance on the road. Cars don’t kill
people any more than do guns, yet prudent minds realized the danger of sending
an ignorant, untrained and undisciplined novice onto the road. The same is true for gun enthusiasts, no one
wants to limit their rights to responsible gun ownership and use, we just want
to make sure they know the rules of the road and can demonstrate that they
understand them, and will obey them.
Like my Rambo friends in the forest who didn’t follow the clearly posted
rules, were acting irresponsibly and showing their ignorance of prudent gun
use, they should lose their license until they can show that they have been
trained in some good sense and maturity.
By the way, how often does a hunter effectively bring down a deer with a
15 round clip? Like the car enthusiast
who often shows his machismo with more horsepower, I sense these 15+ shot clips
displays the same high levels of testosterone.
If this
example isn’t enough, how about the recent story of a Michigan man who shot and
killed an inebriated black teenage girl with a shotgun blast to the face
through a locked screen door; he is now claiming “stand your ground”
amnesty. It’s hard to imagine a
reasonable gun community supporting such irresponsible behavior. All he had to do was close the front door,
click the lock and call 911; he was not inebriated, or hasn’t alleged it, he
was old enough to have some good sense, and he should have shown maturity in
defusing this less than threatening event.
For the gun
community, the paranoid thought that 300 million weapons would be confiscated
by the federal government is absolutely ludicrous to me. We live in a world of instantaneous social
media, any attempt at mass confiscation of guns would turn into a civil war
assuming the army would even obey such an order. And the argument of dictators collecting guns
as a first act to total power assumes that Congress would stand for it, the
military would stand for it and that the American people would stand for
it. If these groups didn’t stand their
ground against such a tyrant, we have much bigger problems than just the
confiscation of weapons.
So I guess
my question remains: “What kind of United States do the America people want?” The Third World gun photo of gun totting
Americans accompanying this opinion, or a less threatening world where guns are
registered in case they are stolen, shooters licensed to prove competence, guns
being left under lock and key until your next hunting adventure or trip to an
authorized target practice shooting range, and a shift from “stand your ground”
laws to the less bellicose laws on the right to self-defense.